The Goal-First Method · 10 Rules
What this chapter tests: a set of 5 bullet-point notes about a topic, followed by a sentence that says "The student wants to ___." You pick the choice (out of 4 longer sentences) that uses the notes to accomplish that exact goal.
Jump straight to the last sentence: "The student wants to ___." Read it BEFORE the bullets. The bullets are a distraction trap; you only need the ones the goal actually points to.
Two words win the whole game: the verb (emphasize / summarize / describe / introduce / illustrate) and the topic (the noun after it — a difference, the finding, the audience, the fabric). Circle them.
Even if every word in the choice is true, eliminate it if it doesn't do the verb or cover the topic. True ≠ correct. The bank's #1 trap is an all-true sentence that misses the goal.
sat.ivypath.ioPage 1 of 2Specialized Rules · verb playbook + 3 traps
violates Rule N.
Look up that rule below to see the pattern and the example. Foundation Rules 1–3 are on Page 1.
Choice must spotlight the topic. If the topic is "a difference" between two things, the correct choice names both items AND the actual contrast — not just one item, not a shared trait.
Goal: emphasize a difference between Fabric A and B → answer mentions both and shows the contrast
Choice must give the overall conclusion that holds across the bullets — not the content of one bullet. A single specific detail = wrong, even if true.
Goal: summarize the study → overall takeaway wins, not "the sample was 200 people"
Choice must give a concrete instance of the topic — a specific case, name, number, event. A definition or general statement is the wrong shape, even if true.
Goal: illustrate a use of the alloy → "used in turbine blades" beats "alloys are mixtures of metals"
Unfamiliar audience → include background / definition / context. Familiar audience → skip the basics; jump to the specific point. Match what the goal says about who's listening.
Goal: introduce X to an audience unfamiliar with it → choice that defines X wins
Every word in the choice is true per the bullets — but it doesn't do what the verb asks. Wrong-shape answer. If the choice doesn't do the verb, it loses even if it's 100% accurate.
Verb = emphasize a difference → trap: a true sentence stating only similarities
When the goal compares two things, the trap mentions only one. Half the comparison = automatic eliminate. Both items must appear, and the contrast must be real.
Goal: contrast bird X and bird Y → trap: "X migrates south in winter" (no Y, no contrast)
Choice uses bullet vocabulary but mashes the numbers, swaps attributions, or escalates a hedge (e.g., "may have" → "did"). Word-match feels right; the claim doesn't match the bullet.
Bullet: "X may have caused Y" → trap: "X caused Y" (hedge escalated to certainty)
sat.ivypath.ioPage 2 of 2